That power is not the only hazard analytical balances criterion showed the Fukushima accident, whic

Most recently was published Daiņa Ivan and Andrei Ožegovska article "ATOMERS to ļampampā". Current anti-AES article of the series John Brizga "Kodolaritmētika" and Agris Auce 'Munks analytical balances and .... "whose task is unclear, but not necessarily green, intent on behalf of incitement and tracināt less educated and knowledgeable folks to stand against nuclear power in Latvia indentured is the only way to keep more or less energy independence.
And it comes, I think, this time not for the superficial article (MAGATE, Cesium-37), but a row is quite deliberately distorted and biased facts and expression. The only thing that surprised that each subsequent article is laxer and melīgāks.
The reasons can only guess - or anti-nuclear hysteria analytical balances stoker sponsors become meaner (as paid, it works), or they mistakenly hopes that this hysteria to start the fire, will burn on its own, which needless to go to the expense. Well, this time turned out badly wrong, so would place part-time discussion of this and the previous article authors.
1) "nuclear war will continue as long as the planet will run at least one nuclear power plant. Humanity is not morally mature "peace atom" for use. It just does not understand children or fools "(..) written by director Andrei Tarkovsky. Petersburg nuclear physicist and nuclear reactor safety expert Andrei Ožegovskis now says the same thing - not a secure AES.
Really - Andrei Tarkovsky was a great director, analytical balances but hardly any expert kodollietās; Andrew Ožegovskis - appears rather weak nuclear physicist, but qualifying analytical balances for talent Blēņu and distress storytelling. How, then, can be repeated, and that AES atomic bomb is a completely different things. Not the atomic bomb can make AES, nor vice versa.
Another argues that AES is mainly needed to be at the atomic (also Ožegovskis all the time makes hints about it). The facts suggest the opposite: most of the countries that tīkojušas after their A-bombs, they have set up first, then only AES. Of the 17 European countries that have AES, only every sixth has nuclear weapons. Worse: Israel, North Korea has nuclear weapons, but not AES, right next to South Korea - vice versa. Those who are not convinced by the assertion of building a nuclear reactor and the fundamental differences, encourage analytical balances to think why the first hydrogen fusion bomb blew up in the middle of the last century, but still not a fusion reactor and "ITERA" pilot project promises to only complete around 2050, if lucky. That's why these oil-gas-coal dolārzaļie agitators analytical balances when everyone else refuted their arguments, taking out the last - sak, hurry with those "dirty and dangerous" AES, wait, soon there will be a fusion analytical balances reactor, well knowing that the mass will be at least 50, possibly analytical balances 100 years.
Another funkiest is their contention that these reactors would be more secure than AES, although no functional but has not yet been built! Whence such zeal? Because the oil-gas-coal business RES (renewable energy) is not a serious competitor, but rather an ally, but it is AES. Believe? analytical balances Then look at the Germany and Japan replaced the missing kodolelektrību. Not with solar cells, but activation of fuel oil, gas or coal-fired TPP (thermal power plant), based on both the coal. Germany is still the possibility of the same kodolelektrību imported from France and the Czech Republic, in the future hopes of the new Russian-owned Baltic NPP.
Perhaps hoping that the same honor is also shown to us. Engine, we have sufficient problems with one another from the same party who have come Ermua (... Erman). About this clown we only pasmiesimies together, enjoying analytical balances his profound nonsense.
3) They also Belarusian NPP nuclear potential impact zone "do not exceed" 3.5 km around the station, while the Finnish NPP builders of the same power station the potential hazards of "guarantees" of 600 miles, but the Norwegians last year figured that one fly all harmful radionuclides 1000 km.
It also has a modern III and III + generation of reactors being built in Olkiluoto, at Konigsberg and raise Belarus. Finns and Norwegians apparently talking about the Soviet Chernobyl-type LWGR (Russian designation - RBMK), which is still four "growls" Leningrad NPP and in 11 other locations. The type of world we do not construct and no one else in Russia can not anymore, because even the Leningrad NPP new reactors will be PWR type.
That power is not the only hazard analytical balances criterion showed the Fukushima accident, which crashed while four II generation BWR type (by design, one might say, closer than LWGR PWR type) reactors with a total capacity of three times in an accident analytical balances at the Chernobyl reactor power was built earlier than Chernobyl but worked ten times longer (and therefore it is expected that there had accumulated a d