Answer every question - 'What if?', Call log | to fixed
Some time ago, someone sent me a question via the site. I will present it in my own words: Let me guess your weight (Balance) a sealed box with a bird in it. Is reading the scale will be lower when the bird flew inside the box in relation to the point where it meets the floor of the box? In other words, whether the box is easier when a bird flew into the air and resting on the bottom.
A great question because on the one hand is very simple view and on the other hand very confusing solving, and requires thought. On the one hand is hypothetical, no one really interested in weight general self efficacy scale box with a bird in it, and on the other it exposes the basic principles of mechanics general self efficacy scale we all thought we already know.
A few years ago, Randall Munroe (Munroe), the creator of the web comic xkcd Open Jackie successful new venture which he invited readers to send him hypothetical questions and try to answer them seriously. The questions guiding principle is that no matter how the situation in which he describes the question, but only in what happens afterwards. Everything is permitted. From this point Monroe answers the question with scientific tools, with simple lines and comics with humor. For example: What if we try to hit a baseball thrown at us by 90 percent the speed of light. Hint: It does not end well, as most questions. It's general self efficacy scale more complicated than you might think.
Book reading light and not binding. It can be read easily on the road, and very appropriate gift book or a book lay on the coffee table. The book also contains a number of interesting questions that expanded my mind about whether you can take off by firing a machine gun toward the ground, or can boil a cup of tea by mixing a very high speed. Some funny questions general self efficacy scale like what would happen if Negad together mole (chemistry general self efficacy scale sheer number) of moles (moles, animal), and the answer says something about orders of magnitude.
While reading the book, I remembered something. Actually never watched a row after xkcd Web sites or spin-off of 'what general self efficacy scale if?'. Usually I read and enjoyed only when someone sends me a link. I must admit continuous reading general self efficacy scale in a book of questions and answers was exciting much less. The jokes were not as funny, and many of the answers were a drag horribly. Footnotes many were exhausting. My impression He moves better text Single Post online which you can flip through loosely.
Another thing that bothered me the book, he really did not learn anything from him. In most cases, Monroe does not explain his calculations, general self efficacy scale only marks the final results and its conclusions. When he discusses physics it does not explain it but just throwing names and concepts casually. For example, the term plasma is mentioned numerous times in the book without having bothered to explain adequately what it's all about. It's all very superficial.
In conclusion, it is my opinion that the book might be a good idea to gift or a book on the coffee table (or even leafing through services), ie nice for browsing, reading less. As for content: read from time to time on the Internet - nice, sometimes tedious. Read a book sequentially - horribly tedious, sometimes nice.
I will answer you the same answer I replied disturbing general self efficacy scale the original questioner. This is me. This is a classic question easy to find her answer online, for example by typing 'flying bird in a cage box' search engine. For that reason I prefer general self efficacy scale to leave you the pleasure of finding her alone. And not only that I will not let you directly to the answer, I'll add other relevant questions: 1. Does a person sitting on a boat carrying a fan (and Intltor) can cause the boat to move by pointing to sail? 2. Can the Baron Mincaozn general self efficacy scale save himself from drowning in a swamp by his hair he shall take and pull itself out? And a slightly different general self efficacy scale question: 3. What will the weight (scales) If you stand on it and waving their hands firmly up and down like a bird?
I follow two sites (also XKCD, and whatif) for many years, and at least for the questions - why it works much better on the site, is that about the idea two have a link to the site explains it (usually Wikipedia, sometimes not), so call and playing, but if by chance you fell on something that interests you recognize the passage - you are just two clicks and can really explore the issue seriously. I learned how some very interesting things (when I had time to sit and read in depth there ... this is no longer general self efficacy scale so happens)
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. general self efficacy scale (Log off / Change)
Recent Posts Science Mathematics crazy images when needed cutting - lobotomy as a case study Why study something that has no use? The liquid crystal finger of Galileo - a call log There Will Be Blood - Recommendation 'short' educational game three reasons not to dip a finger in a cup of coffee - the temperature measuring nanoscale raining oil - the measurement of electron charge (oil drop experiment) Conservative or Conservative? On how to duplicate general self efficacy scale the DNA helix (trial Mslson-Stal) the most successful failure in the history of physics - the Michelson-Morley general self efficacy scale experiment answer every question - 'What general self efficacy scale if?', Call log Honey, I Shrunk the Kids and time lengthened general self efficacy scale - Introduction introduction to the preamble to the theory of relativity how to fall correctly general self efficacy scale - the trial of Galileo's inclined plane of a strange experiment general self efficacy scale Pictet - the particles of dark and cold particles whether DNA is the genetic material really? Part B - what you can do with Blender general self efficacy scale Is he really the DNA genetic material? Part I - what you can learn from pneumonia
University nonlinear optics and optical electronics artificial intelligence biology developmental biology and molecular biology Biophysics Genetics Posts history of science electrical engineering philosophizing recommendation opinion column materials technology transistor general self efficacy scale Physical Chemistry Chemical Sciences feedback loop semiconductor bad science meta-materials microscopy dimensions VAT mechanics of complex systems
Some time ago, someone sent me a question via the site. I will present it in my own words: Let me guess your weight (Balance) a sealed box with a bird in it. Is reading the scale will be lower when the bird flew inside the box in relation to the point where it meets the floor of the box? In other words, whether the box is easier when a bird flew into the air and resting on the bottom.
A great question because on the one hand is very simple view and on the other hand very confusing solving, and requires thought. On the one hand is hypothetical, no one really interested in weight general self efficacy scale box with a bird in it, and on the other it exposes the basic principles of mechanics general self efficacy scale we all thought we already know.
A few years ago, Randall Munroe (Munroe), the creator of the web comic xkcd Open Jackie successful new venture which he invited readers to send him hypothetical questions and try to answer them seriously. The questions guiding principle is that no matter how the situation in which he describes the question, but only in what happens afterwards. Everything is permitted. From this point Monroe answers the question with scientific tools, with simple lines and comics with humor. For example: What if we try to hit a baseball thrown at us by 90 percent the speed of light. Hint: It does not end well, as most questions. It's general self efficacy scale more complicated than you might think.
Book reading light and not binding. It can be read easily on the road, and very appropriate gift book or a book lay on the coffee table. The book also contains a number of interesting questions that expanded my mind about whether you can take off by firing a machine gun toward the ground, or can boil a cup of tea by mixing a very high speed. Some funny questions general self efficacy scale like what would happen if Negad together mole (chemistry general self efficacy scale sheer number) of moles (moles, animal), and the answer says something about orders of magnitude.
While reading the book, I remembered something. Actually never watched a row after xkcd Web sites or spin-off of 'what general self efficacy scale if?'. Usually I read and enjoyed only when someone sends me a link. I must admit continuous reading general self efficacy scale in a book of questions and answers was exciting much less. The jokes were not as funny, and many of the answers were a drag horribly. Footnotes many were exhausting. My impression He moves better text Single Post online which you can flip through loosely.
Another thing that bothered me the book, he really did not learn anything from him. In most cases, Monroe does not explain his calculations, general self efficacy scale only marks the final results and its conclusions. When he discusses physics it does not explain it but just throwing names and concepts casually. For example, the term plasma is mentioned numerous times in the book without having bothered to explain adequately what it's all about. It's all very superficial.
In conclusion, it is my opinion that the book might be a good idea to gift or a book on the coffee table (or even leafing through services), ie nice for browsing, reading less. As for content: read from time to time on the Internet - nice, sometimes tedious. Read a book sequentially - horribly tedious, sometimes nice.
I will answer you the same answer I replied disturbing general self efficacy scale the original questioner. This is me. This is a classic question easy to find her answer online, for example by typing 'flying bird in a cage box' search engine. For that reason I prefer general self efficacy scale to leave you the pleasure of finding her alone. And not only that I will not let you directly to the answer, I'll add other relevant questions: 1. Does a person sitting on a boat carrying a fan (and Intltor) can cause the boat to move by pointing to sail? 2. Can the Baron Mincaozn general self efficacy scale save himself from drowning in a swamp by his hair he shall take and pull itself out? And a slightly different general self efficacy scale question: 3. What will the weight (scales) If you stand on it and waving their hands firmly up and down like a bird?
I follow two sites (also XKCD, and whatif) for many years, and at least for the questions - why it works much better on the site, is that about the idea two have a link to the site explains it (usually Wikipedia, sometimes not), so call and playing, but if by chance you fell on something that interests you recognize the passage - you are just two clicks and can really explore the issue seriously. I learned how some very interesting things (when I had time to sit and read in depth there ... this is no longer general self efficacy scale so happens)
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. general self efficacy scale (Log off / Change)
Recent Posts Science Mathematics crazy images when needed cutting - lobotomy as a case study Why study something that has no use? The liquid crystal finger of Galileo - a call log There Will Be Blood - Recommendation 'short' educational game three reasons not to dip a finger in a cup of coffee - the temperature measuring nanoscale raining oil - the measurement of electron charge (oil drop experiment) Conservative or Conservative? On how to duplicate general self efficacy scale the DNA helix (trial Mslson-Stal) the most successful failure in the history of physics - the Michelson-Morley general self efficacy scale experiment answer every question - 'What general self efficacy scale if?', Call log Honey, I Shrunk the Kids and time lengthened general self efficacy scale - Introduction introduction to the preamble to the theory of relativity how to fall correctly general self efficacy scale - the trial of Galileo's inclined plane of a strange experiment general self efficacy scale Pictet - the particles of dark and cold particles whether DNA is the genetic material really? Part B - what you can do with Blender general self efficacy scale Is he really the DNA genetic material? Part I - what you can learn from pneumonia
University nonlinear optics and optical electronics artificial intelligence biology developmental biology and molecular biology Biophysics Genetics Posts history of science electrical engineering philosophizing recommendation opinion column materials technology transistor general self efficacy scale Physical Chemistry Chemical Sciences feedback loop semiconductor bad science meta-materials microscopy dimensions VAT mechanics of complex systems
No comments:
Post a Comment