On October 22, I wrote a post about Göta Court of Appeal scandalous judgment in the case against th

On October 22, I wrote a post about Göta Court of Appeal scandalous judgment in the case against the man who nätpublicerade intimate doran scales pictures of herself and the non-respondents girlfriend. The reader may recall that the Court of Appeal reduced the damages on the grounds that ordinary people's desire to retain the intimate within their own sphere nowadays would be back educated and therefore less value even in economic terms. I use the word "were" because the judgment in this part - according appeals judge Lennart Östbloms admission - not based on any scientific study, but was a mere surmise. Suzanne Eberstein belong to members of the Court of Appeal. Maybe she voted against, I know nothing about. Today I read that she as deputy speaker of parliament allowed remote Baroque painter GE Schröder (1684-1750) painting "Juno," depicting a woman with bared breasts, from the Parliamentary guest dining room. Leaderboard described as an allegory of the fire in a suite called The Four Elements, probably on loan from the National Museum. If I understand it correctly, the sight of this picture of Eberstein experienced as a violation. In the society in which we find ourselves, I meet that man a daily stream of images of more or less undressed women that really offends doran scales women. They violate even me as a man because they reduce me to a sexual creature. But Schroeder's doran scales pathetic Baroque painting? Is it one of those pictures? Is it not the earliest of these images of feminine DREAMY submission weighing doran scales on some official environments doran scales and as we long ago got used to pass without touching? To Eberstein struck at this particular painting is explained in an interview for the Sundsvall Newspaper: "... doran scales I find it strange that I, as a woman should sit there and look at other naked women with a lot of men. I'm glowing feminist and it feels like you objectify women simply. doran scales " Of Ebersteins answer, I conclude that her reaction is partly doran scales political, the result of accumulated experience of the attitudes and imagery with which to treat women in our society. Thus she is working on the issue, she looks at his surroundings with uppövad eye and cuts to even the phenomena that many others would let pass. Plenty! Now I wonder how this approach is applied in the community in which even women of the people doran scales and disadvantaged women by living their lives. Enjoys the same protection? Are they offended at the same levels? doran scales Or is the judicial body the sentencing so cleverly worded that they respond to different putative groups presumption levels of perceived kränkthet? doran scales ****** From DN 22 October 2013:
Newer Post Older Post Home
Blog Archive January (1) December (6) November (1) October (1) May (1) April (2) March (5) January (1) December (2) November (1) October (1) August (1) July (1) June (2) May (2) February (1) January (2) November (3) April (5) March (2) January doran scales (4) December (1) June (1) May (1) March (9 ) February (9) January (7) December (7) November (1) October (5) September (3) August (7)